
![]()
![]()
Viruses may be defined as acellular
organisms whose genomes consist of nucleic acid, and which obligately replicate
inside host cells using host metabolic machinery and ribosomes
to form a pool of components which assemble into particles called VIRIONS, which serve to protect the genome and
to transfer it to other cells.
They are distinct from other so-called VIRUS-LIKE AGENTS such as VIROIDS
and PLASMIDS and PRIONS
"Viruses
are entities whose genomes are elements of nucleic acid that replicate inside
living cells using the cellular synthetic machinery, and cause the synthesis of
specialised elements [virions] that can
transfer the genome to other cells".
SE
Luria, JE Darnell, D Baltimore and A Campbell (1978).
General Virology, 3rd Edn. John Wiley & Sons, New York, p2 of 578.
Viruses 2:
"Virus are submicroscopic,
obligate intracellular parasites...[and]
·
Virus particles (virions)
are formed from the assembly of pre-formed components;
·
Virus particles themselves do not
"grow" or undergo division;
·
Viruses lack the genetic information which
encodes apparatus necessary for the generation of metabolic energy or for
protein synthesis (eg: ribosomes)".
AJ Cann (1997). Principles of molecular
virology, 2nd Edition. Academic Press, San Diego.
The concept of a virus as an
organism challenges the way we define life:
By older, more zoologically and botanically biased criteria, then, viruses are not living. However, this sort of argument results from a "top down" sort of definition, which has been modified over years to take account of smaller and smaller things (with fewer and fewer legs, or leaves), until it has met the ultimate "molechisms" or "organules" - that is to say, viruses - and has proved inadequate.
Classical Properties
of Living Organisms:
·
Reproduction
·
Nutrition
·
Respiration
·
Irritability
·
Movement
·
Growth
·
Excretion
More modern definitions include the storage and replication of
genetic information as nucleic acid, and the presence of or potential for,
enzyme catalysis
(Penguin Dictionary of Biology, 9th Edition, 1994)
Life
may (somewhat irreverently) be defined in general terms as:
"The phenomenon associated with the replication of self-coding
informational systems",
or
more specifically as:
"The phenomenon associated with the replication of nucleic
acids".
- Rybicki EP, 1996.
Another
more serious view:
"Life can be viewed as a complex
set of processes resulting from the actuation of the instructions encoded in
nucleic acids. In the nucleic acid of living cells these are actuated all the
time; in contrast, in a virus they are actuated only when the viral nucleic
acid, upon entering a host cell, causes the synthesis of virus-specific
proteins. Viruses are thus "alive when they replicate in cells, while
outside cells viral particles are metabolically inert and are no more alive
than fragments of DNA."
- Dulbecco R and Ginsberg HS, 1980.
Virology, p.854-855 (originally published as a section in Microbiology, 3rd Edn., Davis et al., Harper and Row, Hagerstown).
Copyright Ed Rybicki, October 1995;
April, June,1998
If one defines
life from the bottom up - that is, from the simplest forms
capable of displaying the most essential attributes of a living thing
- one very quickly realises that the only real criterion for life is:
and that only systems that contain nucleic acids -
in the natural
world, at least - are capable of this phenomenon. This
sort of reasoning has led to a new definition of organisms:
Organism:
"An organism is the unit element
of a continuous lineage with an individual evolutionary history."
SE Luria, JE Darnell, D Baltimore and A Campbell
(1978). General Virology, 3rd Edn. John Wiley & Sons, New York, p4 of 578.
The key words here are UNIT ELEMENT, and INDIVIDUAL: the thing
that you see, now, as an organism is merely the current slice in a
continuous lineage; the individual evolutionary history denotes the independence
of the organism over time. Thus, mitochondria and chloroplasts and
nuclei and chromosomes are not organisms, in that together they constitute
a continuous lineage, but separately have no possibility of survival, despite
their independence before they entered initially
symbiotic, and then dependent associations.
The
concept of replication is contained within the concepts of individual viruses
constituting continuous lineages, and having an evolutionary history.
Thus, given this sort of lateral thinking, viruses become quite
respectable as organisms:
by
EP Rybicki (1999). An Electronic
Introduction to Molecular Virology. Buglet Electronic Press, Cape Town.
Acellular
Organisms:
acellular: not composed of cells ( = "bodies of protoplasm made discrete
by an enveloping plasma membrane");
Penguin Dictionary of Biology, 9th Edition, 1994
Genome:
The total genetic complement of a virus. This may be composed of RNA or DNA,
and be single- or double-stranded. It may also be
fragmented.
Other
Autonomous or Semi-Autonomously Replicating Genomes
There
are a number of types of genomes which have some sort of independence from
cellular genomes: these include "retrons"
or retrotransposable elements,
bacterial and fungal (and eukaryotic organelle) plasmids,
satellite nucleic acids and satellite viruses which depend on helper viruses for
replication, and viroids. A new
class of agents - PRIONS - appear to be
"proteinaceous infectious agents" (see also here for an ICTV description, here for some local information
and more links).

Depiction of Prions infecting Neurons: from Russell Kightley Media
Plasmids
Plasmids may share a number of properties with viral genomes - including
modes of replication, as in ss circular DNA plasmids and viruses -
but are not pathogenic to their host organisms, and are transferred
by conjugation between cells rather than by free extracellular particles.
Satellite
Nucleic Acids
Certain viruses have associated with them nucleic acids that are dispensable
in that they are not part of the genome, which have no (or very little)
sequence similarity with the viral genome, yet depend on the virus for
replication, and are encapsidated by the virus. These
are mainly associated with plant viruses and are generally ssRNA,
both linear and circular - however, a circular ssDNA satellite of a
plant geminivirus has recently been found.
Satellite
Viruses
There are also viruses which depend for their replication on HELPER VIRUSES: a good example is tobacco
necrosis satellite virus (sTNV), which has a small
piece of ssRNA which codes only for a capsid protein, and depends for its
replication on the presence of TNV. Another
good example is the hepatitis delta agent with its circular ssRNA
genome. The adeno-associated viruses (AAVs)
are also satellite viruses dependent on the linear dsDNA adenoviruses
for replication, but which have linear ssDNA genomes and appear to be degenerate
or defective parvoviruses.
Viroids
Viroids are small naked circular ssRNA genomes which appear rodlike
under the EM, which are capable of causing diseases in plants. They code
for nothing but their own structure, and are presumed to replicate by
somehow interacting with host RNA polymerase, and to cause pathogenic
effects by interfering with host DNA/RNA metabolism and/or transcription. A
structurally similar disease agent in humans is the hepatitis B
virus-dependent hepatitis delta agent, which additionally codes for a
structural protein.
Copyright Ed Rybicki, April, June,1998; March 1999, November 2000
Retroviridae [ssRNA(+) viruses
replicating via a longer-than-genome-length dsDNA intermediate], Hepadnaviridae, caulimoviruses and
badnaviruses [family Caulimoviridae, gapped circular dsDNA viruses
replicating via longer-than-genome-length RNA intermediates] all share the
unlikely attribute of the use of an enzyme complex consisting of a
RNA-dependent DNA polymerase/RNAse H in order to replicate. They share this
attribute with several retrotransposons, which are eukaryotic
transposable cellular elements with striking similarities with retroviruses
[such as the yeast Ty element, the mammalian LINE-1
elements, and the Drosophila copia element]; and with
retroposons, which are eukaryotic elements which transpose via RNA
intermediates, but share no obvious genomic similarity with any viruses
other than the reverse transcriptase.
Bacteria such as E coli also have reverse- transcribing
transposons -known as retrons - but these are very different to any
of the eukaryotic types while preserving similarities in certain of the
essential reverse transcriptase sequence motifs.
All of
these elements are collectively known as RETROELEMENTS;
the fact that the reverse transcriptases of all of
them have some amino acid identity suggests a common evolutionary origin.
Several reviewers have pointed out that just such an enzyme as reverse
transcriptase would have been necessary for the transition from what is
widely believed to have been an RNA world - that is, where all the extant organsisms had RNA genomes - to the present world in which all
cellular organisms have DNA genomes.
Viruses with RNA genomes which use RNA-dependent RNA polymerases for
their replication may be the only remnants of that pre-DNA era; however,
cellular elements and viruses which use reverse transcriptase may share
a common origin as cell-derived "modules" coding for a reverse
transcriptase, which evolved to become retrons and retroposons and
retrotransposons. Addition of structural proteins may have allowed
evolution of retroviruses.
The evolution of the DNA retroviruses - Hepadnaviridae,
caulimo- and badnaviruses - is more obscure; it
appears as though these arose from retrotransposon-like sequences, but
this probably occurred near the origin of of these
types of element as they are so diverse in sequence and genome organisation.
It is believed that retrotransposons may contribute substantially to the
evolution of their hosts. Evidence for this has been obtained by studying human
LINE-1s (Long Interspersed Nuclear Elements) - a group of retrotransposable
elements which make up approximately 15 % of the human genome. The vast
majority of LINE-1s are no longer retrotransposition
competent and it is believed that in humans only between 30 and 60 full length
LINE-1s are currently active. There is strong evidence from sequences in the
sequence databases to suggest that active LINE-1s play an important role in
"exon shuffling" (belived to be the major
mechanism of macro-evolution whereby entirely new genes are created by
reshuffling the components of older genes). The most compelling evidence that
LINE-1s do facilitate exon shuffling, however, is the experimental demonstration
that they are not only able to move large amounts of non-LINE-1 exonic DNA but also insert this DNA into unrelated
expressed genes to obtain chimeras which encode active hybrid gene products.
References:
Chapter 7: "Evolution by transposition" (pp. 172-203) in
"Fundamental of Molecular Evolution" by Wen-Hsiung
Li and Dan Graur; Sinauer
Associates, Inc., Sunderland, Mass., 1991
Moran, J. V., R. J. DeBerardinis,
and H. H. Kazazian. 1999. Exon shuffling by L1
Retrotransposition. Science 283:1530-1534.
VIRIONS are virus particles:
they are the INERT CARRIERS of the genome, and are ASSEMBLED
inside cells, from virus-specified
components: they do not GROW, and do not form by DIVISION.
They may be regarded as the EXTRACELLULAR
PHASE of the virus: they are exactly analogous to "spacecraft"
in that they take viral genomes from cell to cell, and they protect
the genome in inhospitable environments in which the virus
cannot replicate.
Excellent
examples of virions - and an explanation
of their basic structure - may be seen here, at the
University of Cape Town's Medical Microbiology Department home page.
For other excellent representations of virus structure, go
to the University of Wisconsin's Institute for Molecular Virology,
where Jean-Yves Sgro has assembled a gallery of 3-D
image reconstructions of different viruses, together with explanations
of structure.
copyright
June 1998 by EP Rybicki unless otherwise stated


Basically, all virions have:
SOME virions additionally have:

If the virions are simple NUCLEOPROTEINS - that is, contain
only nucleic acid and protein - then they are usually composed ONLY of virus-specified
components. However, certain host components may be
"trapped" within virions, such as POLYAMINES:
these are polycationic compounds which serve to neutralise charge on
the viral nucleic acid as it is packed into the CAPSID,
or protein coat. PAPOVAVIRUSES
may in addition encapsidate host histones
associated in NUCLEOSOME complexes
with virus genomic DNA.
More complex virions - those with membranes,
and/or large genomes - may additionally incorporate host
membrane proteins in their envelopes: while this may be a side
effect of the "budding" process by which viral nucleoprotein
complexes acquire envelopes, it may also in some cases be a mechanism
for avoidance of host immune systems (eg: hepatitis B virus
incorporates host serum albumin into its capsid).
This
is one of the SIMPLEST FORMS of viral capsid: the protein
is "wound on" to the viral nucleic acid
(generally ssRNA, though M13 and other filamentous
phage virions contain circular ssDNA) in a simple HELIX,
like a screw (see the diagram for tobacco mosaic virus, below).

courtesy L Stannard
In the case of TMV this is the entire virion: this is also the case for all RODLIKE
and FILAMENTOUS virions where no membranes are involved. This
includes all Tobamoviridae, Potyviridae, and Closteroviridae,
but NOT Filoviridae, like Ebola virus (see here).
In other cases, filamentous helical nucleocapsids
may be enclosed within matrix protein and a membrane
studded with spike proteins: excellent examples of this
are PARAMYXOVIRIDAE, images of which can be found here, at Linda Stannard's site.
These are built up according to simple
structural principles, as amply outlined here,
and in more detail
here. Put simply, nearly all isometric virions are
constructed around a BASIC ICOSAHEDRON, or
solid with 20 equilateral trinagles for faces.
It suffices to say that the "quasi-icosahedral" capsid is
possibly Nature's most popular means of enclosing viral nucleic acids;
they come in many sizes, from tiny T=1 structures (Nanoviruses, eg:
banana bunchy top virus; 18 nm diameter) to huge structures such as
those of Iridoviridae or Phycodnaviridae
(over 200 nm diameter). A good example of a simple structure is
illustrated below in the animated GIF: this shows cowpea chlorotic mottle (CCMV) virion surface structure
(courtesy J-Y Sgro),
which is composed of 180 copies of a single coat protein molecule.
The different colours in the picture represent different "positional
states" of the capsid protein: subunits around 5-fold
rotational axes of symmetry are BLUE, and cluster as PENTAMERS;
subunits around 3-fold axes are RED and GREEN to reflect
their different 2-fold symmetries; they cluster as HEXAMERS
around "local 6-fold axes".
Another recent example - that of turnip yellow mosaic
virus (TYMV) - is given here.
This has exactly the same basic structure, with a single type of coat
protein subunit, only the pentamer-hexamer clustering is more
pronounced
A more complex capsid - that
of the common-cold-causing Rhinovirus R16 (family: Picornaviridae),
with 60 copies of 4 proteins in a T=3 structure - is shown below
(animation modified from one by J-Y Sgro). This shows a capsid
with a cutaway, to reveal internal structure. BLUE subunits
around 5-fold axes are VP1; RED and GREEN are VP3
and VP2 respectively; YELLOW subunits (seen only internally) are VP4.
The
VP4 subunits are formed by autocatalytic cleavage of VP0 (into VP2
and VP4) upon binding of a "procapsid"
with viral genomic ssRNA.
See here
for further details of picornaviruses, here for a
scheme showing picornavirus assembly, and here for a
scheme outlining polyprotein processing of picornaviruses, and here for
material from the Leicester course.
More complex structures may be seen at Linda Stannard's Web site.
A universal system for classifying viruses, and a unified taxonomy, has been established by the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (ICTV) since 1966. The system makes use of a series of ranked taxons, with the:
For example, the Ebola virus from Kikwit is classified as:
- Family Filoviridae
- Genus Filovirus
- Species: Ebola virus Zaire
An excellent resource for virus taxonomy is the International Committee on Virus Taxonomy (ICTV) Database, the ICTVdB, maintained at the Australian National University by Cornelia Büchen-Osmond and Mike Dallwitz.
It is organised as a collection of several pages, accessible as an alphabetical list of virus families (index list mirrored locally); from 1: Adenoviridae, to 80: Viroids, as well as according to nucleic acid content and strandedness and according to general viral host range. Data have been entered in DELTA format, and clicking on any familial or lower taxon gives an immediate output from the database:
for example, clicking on " 03. Arenaviridae ... 03.0.1.1.003 Lassa virus" gives us a full description of the virus and its genome, with links to genome database accessions, references, and pictures if available. An excellent place to start if you know nothing about a given disease agent.
A good illustration of classification of viruses is the Index Virum page.
The ICTV proper has a new Web site too: visit it at the National Center for Biotechnology Information server.
- although a number of other criteria - such as disease symptoms, antigenicity, protein profile, host range, etc. - are important in precise identification, consideration of the above three criteria are sufficient in most cases to allow identification of a virus down to familial if not generic level.
An interactive virus identification key is currently under development at this site: test it and see how the criteria rapidly allow identification.
A key developed by Claude Fauquet and included on the ICTV 6th Report is available at the ICTV Web site at the NCBI; an updated and HTMLised version of it is also available here.
Another site offering a virus identification resource is the Bioinformatics Centre at the University of Pune, India : their resource allows the probabilistic identification of unknown animal viruses, as well as suggesting tests to increase accuracy of identification.
|
Prokaryotes: |
||||
|
Eukaryotes: |
||||
For example, virus families infecting two kingdoms of organisms are:
Copyright Ed Rybicki unless otherwise stated, October 1996; November 1997; August 1998
Cytopathic changes
The term "cytopathic effect" (CPE) is frequently applied to virus-induced cellular changes that are visible by light microscopy. These changes include swelling or shrinkage of cells, the formation of multinucleated giant cells (syncytia), and the production of "inclusions" (made visible by staining) in the nucleus or cytoplasm of the infected cell.
The most efficient way to demonstrate cellular changes is by staining with
chromatic dyes.
Cell monolayers are fixed and then exposed to basic and acidic dyes that
accentuate the nature and location of the changes.
The gross appearance of the cellular changes, and the location and nature
of the "inclusions" - i.e. basophilic or eosinophilic - can
in many instances be used as a diagnostic criterion to identify the causative
virus. These will be illustrated for some of the viruses commonly isolated
in cell culture:-
| Syncytia: | The herpes group of viruses: |
|---|---|
| Measles virus Respiratory syncytial virus Mumps virus |
herpes simplex virus human cytomegalovirus varicella zoster virus |
Return to: Medical Microbiology Homepage
Many enveloped viruses possess a fusion protein in their envelopes. This confers the ability of the virion to fuse with the host cell membrane and thus allow entry of the infectious genomic material into the cell cytoplasm. During replication of the virus, expression of the fusion protein at the cell membrane can result in the fusion of neighbouring cells, and the formation of multi-nucleate cells or syncytia.
Very large syncytia can be formed during replication of measles virus in
cell culture.
An additional distinguishing feature of measles is the presence of distinct
eosinophilic inclusions in the nuclei of infected cells.

In the syncytium shown on the right, multiple nuclei are
clustered around an eosinophilic cytoplasmic mass that probably represents
the Golgi compartments of the fused cells.

Intra-nuclear inclusions are clearly visible.

Haemadsorption of erythrocytes on the surface of cells infected
with mumps virus
Return to: Medical Microbiology Homepage
Viruses have a defined "life cycle" as do any other type of
organisms; however, given that they are obligate intracellular parasites, this
cycle revolves around:
getting into a host cell
replicating there, and
getting out again.
For eighteen years now I have taught this cycle under the heading
"Entrance, Entertainment, and Exit*",
as this is the best mnemonic I know to remind one of the process. Other courses tend to label these steps as (for example)
Assembly and Release of Virions
These pages link frequently to the University of Leicester
Microbiology Dept.
Virology 335 course material, mirrored at this site: use the "back" button
on your browser to return from a link.
Copyright Ed Rybicki, August 1997, 1998; March 1999 (Unless otherwise stated)
* = from the Pink Floyd song "The Grand Vizier's Garden Party" (Roger Waters), on the album "Ummagumma". Which also contains the delightful "Several Species of Small Furry Animal Gathered Together in a Cave and Grooving With a Pict", which title is only a little shorter than the unforgettable Hoagy Carmichaels' "I'm a Cranky Old Yank in my Clanky Old Tank, on the Streets of Yokohama With My Honolulu Mama, Doing Those Beat-O, Street-O, Flat on my Seat-O, Hirohito Blues"...but I digress.
Click
here for
Pink Floyd midi files to brighten your browsing.
This depends largely upon the TYPE
of the cell, and of the virus: the cell type has a great deal of
influence on the strategy the virus uses to gain access; in turn,
specific virus types may employ different strategies to gain access to
the same cell type. However, the
greatest commonality in strategy is probably observed between viruses
infecting a single broad type of host, defined by the nature of their
cell walls: these may be defined as:
bacterial (eg: Eubacteria, Archaea)
animal (eg: all animal cells)
plant-like
(eg: green multicellular plants, algae, fungi).
|
|
|
|
![]() Gram-negative cell wall |
![]() Gram-positive cell wall |
![]() Animal cell wall |
![]() Plant cell wall |
Pictures courtesy of Russell Kightley
Links which explain the basic structures of these kinds of cells may be found at
the ESG Biology
Hypertextbook Site at MIT and at the
WWW Cell Biology Course Site.
1. BACTERIAL CELL ENTRY
2. EUKARYOTE CELL ENTRY
a. Animal Cell Entry
b. Plant Cell Entry
c. Fungal Cell Entry
Copyright Ed Rybicki, August 1997; September
2003
(Unless otherwise stated)
Bacterial cell walls are strong and relatively thick, to protect them from osmotic lysis and predation, and to give them shape. GRAM-POSITIVE cells have a single internal lipid bilayer, and a thick PEPTIDOGLYCAN cell wall.

Gram-positive and gram-negative cell walls
(courtesy Russell Kightley)
GRAM-NEGATIVE cells have an internal membrane, a thin peptidoglycan layer, another membrane, and often a polysaccharide-based CAPSULE.
Bacterial viruses (BACTERIOPHAGES) have therefore to have some means of breaching a quite formidable barrier if they are to enter the cell. They also generally have SPECIFIC RECEPTOR SITES on the bacteria, to which SPECIFIC ATTACHMENT PROTEINS bind: these receptor sites may be lipopolysaccharides, cell wall proteins, teichoic acid, or flagellar or pilus proteins.

Phage T4 - Enterobacteria phage T4, genus "T4-like Viruses", family Myoviridae, or viruses with 34-170 kbp dsDNA genomes, isometric heads and contractile tails - infects the gram-negative bacterium E coli. It has one of the more complex entry mechanisms, involving an active injection process. This is shared by others of the so-called T-even phages of the family Myoviridae. The process is shown in the still image above left (courtesy Russell Kightley), and in the animated graphic above right (derived from EM images taken by L Stannard, Dept Medical Microbiology, UCT).
Click here for an non-animated view of the process if your browser does NOT support GIF animation.
The phage tail fibres are the attachment sites; these individually bind the bacterial cell surface - specifically to certain lipopolysaccharides and to the surface outer membrane protein OmpC. This is REVERSIBLE binding, and is probably due to electrostatic interactions as it is Mg2+ and Ca2+ dependent. After TAIL FIBRE binding has consolidated, the BASEPLATE then settles down onto the surface and binds firmly to it. After this occurs, a CONFORMATIONAL CHANGE takes place in baseplate and sheath protein structures, and the TAIL SHEATH CONTRACTS, pushing the TAIL CORE through the cell wall, possibly in an ATP-driven process: this is aided by a lysozyme activity associated with the baseplate assembly. This is an IRREVERSIBLE process. DNA is then extruded from the phage head. This is then used for initial transcription and virus expression.
Phage lambda - Enterobacteria phage λ, genus "λ-like Viruses", family Siphoviridae, a tailed phage with an isometric head and a 49 kbp dsDNA genome - attaches to the maltose receptor on the surface of the E coli cell. Although the tail is non-contractile, a DNA injection mechanism similar to that of T-even phages allows entry of DNA into the cell, leaving the capsid behind.

Lambda phage infecting E coli
(courtesy Russell Kightley)
MS2 phage - Enterobacteria phage MS2, genus Levivirus, family Leviviridae - an isometric single-stranded RNA-containing virus infecting E coli - attaches to PILIN (the building block of PILI) via its single attachment or A PROTEIN. The A protein is covalently linked to the 5'-end of the genomic RNA; thus, when the pilus is retracted into the cell, the A protein and RNA are pulled with it, leaving the empty capsid outside.
Here is an animated diagram of a DNA-containing enveloped isometric phage entering a gram-negative bacterium.
|
Bacterial |
Copyright Ed Rybicki, November 1997, June 1998, March 1999;
September 2003
(Unless otherwise stated)
Eukaryote cells do not have cell walls; they
have only lipid bilayer cell membranes (=PLASMALEMMA
)
with associated
embedded proteins. They also have a very highly developed
INTERNAL
MEMBRANE COMPLEX, consisting of endoplasmic reticulum, Golgi
apparatus, nuclear membrane, and various specialised vesicles such as
LYSOSOMES,
which are involved in intracellular digestion. Eukaryote cells have an
intricate system of vesicle transport centred on the
Golgi apparatus; this involves export of protein(s) and vesicles from
the ER to the Golgi; production of EXPORT vesicles containing proteins from this
for fusion with the cell membrane (=EXOCYTOSIS);
production of LYSOSOMES to fuse with
ENDOSOMES
for digestion of material internalised by
RECEPTOR-MEDIATED
or non-specific
ENDOCYTOSIS
(PHAGOCYTOSIS for particulates; PINOCYTOSIS for liquid). Other
CYTOSKELETON-DIRECTED vesicle trafficking involves targetting of vesicles back
to the Golgi and to the NUCLEAR MEMBRANE.
The initially-formed ENDOCYTOTIC vesicles resulting from receptor-mediated endocytosis are coated with CLATHRIN, a structural protein which promotes curvature of the membrane at COATED PITS - which become vesicles as the protein continues to assemble and impresses the membrane into a sphere. Clathrin is recycled back to the cell membrane after endocytosis, either because of interaction of the vesicle with a lysosome, or due to another process.
Viruses take advantage of these
processes in a number of ways, after they have attached to the cell surface via
binding to a
specific receptor. The simplest is
DIRECT MEMBRANE FUSION,
where the virion membrane fuses with the cell membrane, and the virion
nucleoprotein complex is delivered into the cell cytoplasm directly. This
is generally a pH-independent
process, and requires only that
the membrane be fluid (ie: temperature in the physiological range), and
generally that some divalent cations be present.
The entry process for HIV is shown in the graphic (from the Univ Leicester material, copyright Dr AJ Cann).
Click here for an non-animated view of the process if your browser does not support GIF animation.
Here the virion attachment protein - gp120 - (see also here) attaches initially to the CD4 protein on a helper T-cell. The gp120 undergoes conformational change due to binding, and binds the accessory receptor - CCR-5, a chemokine receptor in this case, although there are others - as well. gp41 - a cleavage product of a gp160 precursor, and a part of the "spike protein" of the viral membrane - is then able to bind into the cell membrane, via a hydrophobic domain. A condensation of the gp41 structure - formation of a "6 helix bundle" - causes close juxtaposition of cell and viral membranes, which promotes membrane fusion and nucleoprotein entry into the cell. An excellent depiction of this process is given on the Roche site.
The entire HIV life cycle is shown here: graphics kindly provided by Russell Kightley.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
HIV virion: outer view |
HIV virion structure: |
HIV cell entry and replication |
PARAMYXOVIRIDAE are also able to enter cells in this fashion; in fact, an F or fusion (glyco)protein purified from enveloped virions of Sendai virus is often used to artificially fuse cells in in vitro experiments.
Another means of cell entry via
membrane interactions is typified by
influenza virus: this attaches to cell
membranes via its
HAEMAGGLUTININ (HA)
protein - a trimeric attachment protein -
which binds NEURAMINIC ACID
residues on cellular glycoproteins. The process is demonstrated in the
accompanying graphic
(from the
Univ
Leicester material, copyright
Dr Shaun Heaphy).
The virion binds reversibly to the cell surface via one or a few attachment proteins. Receptor consolidation results in curvature of the membrane around the particle, and eventual formation of an endocytotic vesicle by a "zipper" process.
Click here for an non-animated view of the process if your browser does not support GIF animation.
A cell surface protease cleavage divides the HA into HA1 and HA2: this causes a conformational change which exposes a hydrophobic "fusion domain" on HA2. A further pH-induced structural change (with lysosome fusion, pH drops), allows insertion of part of HA2 into the vesicle membrane. Another conformational change caused by membrane interaction results in "apposition" of membranes and fusion, allowing escape from the vesicle of the viral nucleoprotein, into the host cell cytoplasm. This is generally known is pH-dependent entry.
Many enveloped viruses share this mode of entry; so too do many non-enveloped viruses, such as the complex dsDNA adenoviruses (Adenoviridae) and the simpler ssRNA picornaviruses (Picornaviridae). The former appear to enter via an endocytotic vesicle, then to interact with the vesicle membrane - probably because of structural alterations due to the pH shift - so as to expel a partially-uncoated viral core structure into the cytoplasm. This is then targetted to the nucleus, where the DNA appears to enter via a nuclear pore.
Picornaviruses do something similar: that is, the capsid becomes rearranged as a result of pH-induced structural transitions, whereby the VP4 internal protein is lost and the surface becomes more lipophilic, and interacts with a vesicle membrane so as to allow exit of the RNA into the cytoplasm. A more complex process may also occur which allows RNA to enter the cell from externally-bound virions.
These mechanisms are summarised in this diagram: click here to link to source page.
Reoviridae -
isometric dsRNA non-enveloped viruses with up to 12 genome components - enter by
endocytosis, are partially uncoated in lysosomes, and then core particles enter
the cytoplasm by an unknown process, perhaps similar to what occurs with
adenoviruses. Core particles then function as virus transcription
"factories"
A basic requirement in the infection of Eukarya would be that
DNA genomes end up in the nucleus - except
for Pox-, Phyco- and some Baculoviridae - and that
RNA genomes end up in the cytoplasm - except
for myxoviruses - as these are the sites where the respective viruses may be
expected to replicate their genomes. DNA is its own nuclear targetting
signal in that naked DNA is seen to be moved into cell nuclei if introduced into
cells; however, most DNA viruses which require a nuclear replication stage seem
to have some specific means of targetting partially-disassembled virions to the
cell nucleus.
Nucleoproteins with nuclear localisation
signals (NLS) are very often involved.
Adenoviruses - large naked isometric virions with linear dsDNA of 30-38kbp - appear to be transported by means of the hexon protein of the partially degraded naked capsid that is released into the cytoplasm, interacting with microtubules. This reaches a nuclear pore and allows escape of viral DNA plus certain viral polypeptides into the nucleus.
Parvoviruses - small naked isometric viruses with linear ~5 kb ssDNA genomes - enter host cells by receptor-mediated endocytosis, escape from endosomal vesicles to the cytoplasm, and then replicate in the nucleus. Canine parvovirus virions at least use the motor protein dynein to be transported along microtubules to the nucleus.
Herpesviruses enter by fusion with the cell membrane, and the core particles migrate to nuclear pores, and release DNA there.
Poxviruses - which have "intracellular" single-enveloped and "extracellular" double-enveloped forms - may enter by direct cell fusion (pH-independent) or lysosomal vesicle fusion (pH-dependent and inhibitable by lysomotropic agents), with the latter perhaps predominating. Once core virions are in the cytoplasm, they uncoat further to expose a nucleoprotein complex which is first transcriptionally and later, replicationally, active.
|
Animal Cell |
Copyright Ed Rybicki, November 1997, April 1998, June 1998,
March 1999, February 2001; September 2003
(Unless otherwise stated)
Plant cells, while superficially similar to animal cells in basic construction as far as all organelles except chloroplasts and often extensive vacuoles are concerned (see here), have one large and fundamental difference to animal cells, which profoundly affects the way in which they are infected by viruses, and how viruses move between them.
This is their possession of thick, rigid, cellulose-based cell walls.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| Plant cell | Detail of cellulose | Plasmodesmata |
courtesy of Russell Kightley
Every
cell is separated from every other cell by cell walls, whose dimensions are far
larger than the size of the average virion (ie: >1
micron, cf. TMV = 300 nm). This means that plant cells are effectively
inaccessible to viruses, even given mechanisms of injection similar to the
T-even phages. Live plant cells interconnect only via specific
discontinuities in the cellulose walls: the most numerous of these are
plasmodesmata, which are complex structures filled with membrane-derived
processes continuous with the endoplasmic reticulum. These are "gated"
intercellular channels, which limit the passage of molecules between cells,
and certainly do not admit particles as large as virions. Plant viruses
have therefore evolved specific movement functions, mediated by one or
more virus-specified proteins, which interact with the plasmosdesmatal machinery
so as to increase the "pore" size, and allow specific transport of viral
nucleoprotein complexes. All plant-infecting viruses possess one or
more movement-related protein (MP) genes: these are very varied, although
there are distinct groups of them, and they appear to derive from host plant
genes for chaperonins and plasmodesmata-associated proteins.
Plant viruses, therefore - which are almost
overwhelmingly ssRNA +ve sense and non-enveloped - do not
appear to specifically interact with host cell membranes or cell walls, as do
bacterial and animal viruses; even when the plant-infecting virus also
infects an animal (eg: plant rhabdoviruses and bunyaviruses) and
presumably behaves normally in the other host, and even though
apparently plant cells are capable of phagocytosis / endocytosis.
The mechanisms employed to enter cells rather appear to be passive carriage
through breaches in the cell wall in the first instance, followed by later
cell-to-cell spread in a plant by means of specifically-evolved
"movement" functions, and perhaps spread via conductive tissue as
whole virions.
The "passive carriage" referred to above could mean:
ONE EXCEPTION to the above rule are some of the PHYCODNAVIRIDAE, which have large (>300 kb) dsDNA genomes, and very large (130 - 200 nm), complex virions. Exemplars which infect algae appear to have specific enzymes at the surface of virions which may degrade the CHITIN cell wall of the alga , to allow interaction of the particle with the cell membrane directly. Some of these viruses also appear to be able to "inject" their DNA, much as phages do, and to enter a lysogenic state.
The mode of transmission of viruses affects their concentration and
localisation in plants. For example, mechanically transmitted viruses
(eg: Bromoviridae, Tobamoviruses) tend to reach very high
concentrations in most tissues of a plant (up to 4g / kg plant): this is
necessary for survival, as it guarantees that a large number of virions will be
present for onward transmission by whatever non-specific means presents itself.
Viruses which are introduced into plants via insect vectors with piercing
mouthparts, on the other hand, tend to be limited in their multiplication to
phloem elements, which are preferred target tissues for insect feeding.
Consequently, these viruses (eg: Luteoviruses,
Geminiviridae)
reach only very low concentrations (mg / kg) in whole plants.
There are certain superficial similarities between plants and FUNGI with respect to the cell wall; however, in the latter case, cell walls are composed of CHITIN, a different complex polysaccharide, and fungal hyphae are often effectively "tubes" with no cross-walls.
No fungal viruses appear to have any specific mechanisms for gaining entry to fungal cells; indeed, it is extremely difficult to demonstrate the infectivity of virus-like particles, and it is only since the advent of the GENE GUN or biolistic transformation apparatus, that many viruses have been shown to be infectious at all - by being "shot" into fungal cells adsorbed onto metal particles.
It is probable that most fungal viruses - like the plant-infecting CRYPTOVIRUS genus of the mainly fungus-infecting Partitiviridae - are only transmitted by "grafting", or the physical connection of infected to healthy cells by anastomosis. Thus, fungal mating is a good means of transmission, as it results in the mixing of cell contents of different hyphae.
|
Plant&Fungal |
Copyright Ed Rybicki, August 1997, October 2000; September
2003
(Unless otherwise stated)

|
DNA |
RNA |
||||||||||
|
double-stranded |
single-stranded |
double-stranded |
single-stranded |
||||||||
|
linear |
circular |
linear |
circular |
linear |
linear (circular)* |
||||||
|
single |
single |
multiple |
single |
single |
multiple |
single |
multiple |
(+)sense |
(-)sense |
||
|
|
single |
multiple |
single |
multiple |
|||||||
Viruses are the only organisms on this planet to still have RNA as their sole genetic material. They are also the only autonomously replicating organisms to have single-stranded DNA. The range of virus genomes as found in virions encompasses:
In contrast, prokaryotes have mainly single-component circular (occasionally multiple) or linear dsDNA (Streptomyces, Helicobacter) while all eukaryotes have multi-component linear dsDNA, and all the genomes replicate via the classic semi-conservative route.
Viral genome types have inspired a classification based on what is found in virions, coupled with their replication strategy. This is the Baltimore Classification, and will be discussed in a broader treatment of Virus Replication.
An overview of the taxa Recognized in the Universal System of Virus Taxonomy in terms of their genome content may be found here.
Copyright Ed Rybicki, August 1997, 1998; March 1999
![]()
The old terms "eclipse phase" or "latent period" describe that part of a virus life cycle when no infectious virus can be extracted from cells which had just been exposed to infectious virions: a good illustration of the concept in terms of a virus assay experiment is shown here.
What happens once a virus is uncoated, or
partially uncoated, depends largely upon what sort of virus it is. The Baltimore Classification of viruses by their genome
types and replication strategies makes it fairly easy to predict the broad sort
of strategy that a virus with a given genome will employ in order to get
replicated. This classification was originally devised by David
Baltimore; it originally only had six categories, but the discovery of "DNA
retroviruses" in the 1980s necessitated a new Class VII.
To understand the classification, one must understand how cells replicate their genomes, and express mRNAs, and proteins. This is conveniently explained by the "Watson-Crick Central Dogma", which states that:
INFORMATION FLOW IN CELLS GOES FROM:
· DNA TO DNA (REPLICATION)
· DNA TO RNA (TRANSCRIPTION)
· AND RNA TO PROTEIN (TRANSLATION)
This may conveniently be described in terms of a diagram showing "information flow":

By contrast, viral replication is far more complicated in terms of information flow:

The classes are:
|
I |
dsDNA
viruses replicating via DNA (semi-conservative) |
|
II |
ssDNA
viruses replicating via DNA (semi-conservative) |
|
III |
dsRNA viruses replicating via (+)RNA (conservative?) |
|
IV |
ssRNA viruses with (+)-sense
genomes replicating via RNA (semi-conservative) |
|
V |
ssRNA viruses with (-)sense
genomes replicating via RNA |
|
VI |
"diploid"
ssRNA viruses which replicate via reverse transcription |
|
VII |
dsDNA viruses which replicate via reverse
transcription with a greater-than-genome-length ssRNA intermediate. |
Copyright Ed Rybicki, August 1997,
1998, March 1999, October 2000
(Unless otherwise stated)
1. Primary transcription by host enzymes
2. Translation of early (=regulatory) proteins
3. Viral genomic DNA replication (usually by host enzymes)
4. Late transcription (usually mediated by viral proteins)
5. Synthesis of late (=structural) proteins
6. Assembly of structural protein and DNA into virions
1. Conversion into dsDNA (=host repair process?)
2. Early transcription (by host enzymes)
3. Translation of (regulatory) protein and "rolling circle" ssDNA replication
4. Late transcription (usually mediated by viral proteins)
5. Synthesis of late (=structural) proteins
6. "Sequestering" of viral genomic ssDNA
7. Assembly into virions
1. Primary transcription in virion core in cytoplasm by viral RDRP, and export of (+)sense RNA to cytoplasm
2. Translation of (+)sense RNA, accumulation of viral proteins
3. Assembly of (+)sense RNA and viral proteins into immature virions
4. Transcription of (+)sense RNA into dsRNA in virions by viral RDRP
5. Secondary transcription of dsRNA
6. Final assembly / maturation of virions
1. Translation of virion RNA as mRNA (early products=RDRP)
2. Synthesis of (-)sense RNA on (+)sense template by RDRP (=formation of replicative complex, RC)
3. Synthesis of (+)sense RNA, mRNA and (-)sense RNA
4. Translation of (+)sense and mRNA, synthesis of structural protein (which biases RC to produce (+)sense RNA?)
5. Assembly of structural protein and (+)sense RNA and maturation of virions
2. Translation mRNAs, accumulation of products
3. Virion proteins interact with RC, bias it towards production of full-length (+)sense RNA and therefore of genomic (-)sense RNA
4. Secondary transcription from progeny (-)sense RNA, translation, accumulation structural proteins
5. Nucleocapsid assembly and maturation, budding of nucleocapsid through host membrane containing viral envelope proteins
2. Conversion of RNA/DNA complex into linear and circular proviral dsDNA forms with long terminal repeats (LTRs) by RT; import into nucleus
3. Integration of linear proviral DNA into host cell DNA, by means of integrase function of RT
4. Replication and trasncription as for host DNA, using host enzymes
5. Modification of transcription by (early) viral products (bias to production of genome-length (+)sense RNA?)
6. Translation, accumulation of (late) structural protein, assembly with (+)sense genomic RNA into viral nucleoprotein, budding through membrane containing viral envelope (glyco)proteins
2. Transcription by host RNA pol into mRNA(s) and longer-than-genome-length "genomic" (+)sense RNA
3. Translation of mRNA and (+)sense RNA in cytoplasm, accumulation of viral products
4. Interaction of viral proteins with (+)sense RNA, assembly of provirions, and reverse transcription of RNA inside virions by viral RT to RNA/DNA complex
5. Conversion of RNA/DNA complex to circular, gapped dsDNA by virion RT
6. Final virion maturation, arrest of further DNA polymerase activity in virion (budding for hepadnaviruses)